Editorial Policies & Publication Ethics

Editorial Policies

The editorial policies governing Materials Chemistry Horizons are collaboratively established by its Editorial Board in conjunction with UniverSci Press. We endorse transparency and ethical standards in research and publication practices. To maintain the integrity of scholarly work, all submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous peer review process by experts in the field. Our editorial team ensures fairness, impartiality, and confidentiality throughout the review process, adhering to the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors.

Publication Ethics

Materials Chemistry Horizons is committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in scholarly publishing. We adhere to the guidelines and principles set forth by reputable organizations such as the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).

Authors submitting manuscripts to Materials Chemistry Horizons are expected to comply with ethical guidelines concerning originality, plagiarism, data fabrication, and proper citation practices. Submitted works must be original and should not have been published elsewhere or be under consideration for publication in other journals.

Ethical considerations and conflicts of interest must be disclosed by authors to ensure transparency and credibility in their research. Materials Chemistry Horizons expects authors to acknowledge and cite sources appropriately, giving due credit to prior work that has influenced their research.

This journal will make every effort to prevent unethical practices. If any issues arise, we will follow the COPE guidelines provided in the COPE guidelines.

Peer Review Process

Materials Chemistry Horizons uses a single-blind peer review process. Manuscripts submitted to Materials Chemistry Horizons undergo rigorous evaluation by independent experts in the relevant field. Our reviewers assess the originality, scientific validity, methodology, and significance of the research presented in the manuscripts.

Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two reviewers who provide constructive feedback, identify strengths and weaknesses, and offer recommendations to enhance the quality and impact of the research. The editorial team, in collaboration with reviewers, makes informed decisions regarding the suitability of manuscripts for publication. Reviewers are expected to adhere to their responsibilities as outlined in the COPE Peer Review Guidelines

Untitled (9).png

Authors are provided with an opportunity to track the status of their manuscripts through their accounts on the journal's website. Our editorial office is readily available to assist authors and address any queries or concerns throughout the submission and review process.

Reviewers

Materials Chemistry Horizons extends its sincere appreciation to the esteemed reviewers who contribute their expertise and time to assess the submitted manuscripts. Our reviewers, eminent scholars and researchers in their respective domains, play a pivotal role in ensuring the quality and credibility of the publications in our journal. Their invaluable feedback and insights significantly shape the final outcome of the manuscripts published in Materials Chemistry Horizons.

Authorship

Authors must meet the criteria for authorship as defined by the COPE guidelines on Authorship Criteria and Authors’ Responsibilities. Changes to authorship after submission or during the review process must be communicated to the editorial office and must adhere to COPE's guidelines on Changes of Authorship.

Plagiarism

UniverSci Press journals are committed to publishing articles that offer originality and unique perspectives. Manuscripts submitted for publication undergo thorough scrutiny to ensure they do not contain text plagiarized from previously published works, including the authors' own materials. Submitted manuscripts are subjected to a comprehensive scan and cross-referencing using iThenticate or Turnitin. Should instances of plagiarism be identified, the manuscript may be rejected outright without undergoing the peer-review process.

Archiving and Self-Archiving

This journal uses Internet Archive (https://archive.org/) as its long-term preservation service. In addition, authors are granted permission to self-archive the accepted manuscript, in either its published PDF or HTML versions, on their personal websites or in repositories designated by their funders or institutions.

Copyright 2024 UniverSci Press Ltd — All Rights Reserved.